Bidding Summary Report
Location: Banteay Meanchey \ Mongkol Borei Budget Year: 2008
| Commune | Contract ID | Bid Date | # Of Bidders | # Valid Bidders | Qty Changed | Award To | Contract Value | Bidding Detail | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Name | Bid Value | Rejected | Note | ||||||||
| District: [102] Mongkol Borei | |||||||||||
| Banteay Neang | 010201/08/01 | 25-Mar-2008 | 6 | 6 | Yes | Lao Bunna [ Lao Bunna ] | 56,824,692 | Lao Bunna [ Lao Bunna ] | 62,945,000 | No | Lowest bid price but higher estimated cost (winner) |
| Pov Thy [ Prom Rithy ] | 68,199,000 | No | Invalid because errio in sum and in multiply | ||||||||
| SAR SONG [ SAR SONG ] | 70,203,364 | No | Has validity but too high bid price | ||||||||
| Prak Sarak [ Sroeun Sokha ] | 71,128,400 | No | Has validity but too high bid pricr | ||||||||
| Sueng Seu [ Sueng Seu ] | 71,181,880 | No | Has not vilidity due to no unit price and sub total price | ||||||||
| Liv Sokun [ Liv Sokun ] | 73,909,360 | No | higher estimated cost and bid form is invalid due to no unit price and sub total price | ||||||||
| Chamnaom | 010203/08/01 | 24-Jun-2008 | 3 | 3 | Yes | Hourt Tuch [ Hourt Tuch ] | 53,527,700 | Hourt Tuch [ Hourt Tuch ] | 55,449,700 | No | Valid, lowest bid price-acceptable |
| SAR SONG [ SAR SONG ] | 58,854,000 | No | Valid, high bid price-not acceptable | ||||||||
| Lao Bunna [ Lao Bunna ] | 60,008,000 | No | Valid, high bid price-not acceptable | ||||||||
| Kouk Ballangk | 010204/08/01 | 24-Jun-2008 | 5 | 5 | No | Chea Sang [ Chea Sang ] | 71,728,000 | Sueng Seu [ Sueng Seu ] | 69,842,000 | No | Invalid by error in multiplying of first ouput |
# Of Bidders: number of contractor submit their bid for the specific contract.
# Valid Bidders: number of contractor accepted by the bidding committee.
Rejected: Yes if the bidding committee reject contractor bidding request.